Dias atras encontré estos dos comentarios que me parece que aun no hemos comprendido en su total profundidad e implicancias. He tomado el texto que refleja la opinión de Tom Peters,y que transcribo a continuacion:
An editorial in today's New York Times says Yahoo admitted that it "helped China sentence a dissident to 10 years in prison by identifying him as the sender of a banned email message." The Times also says that Microsoft, at the Chinese government's request, closed the blog of someone criticizing the government, in addition to enabling the Chinese government to censor MSN searches and blogs.
The Times calls this "obvious disregard for users' privacy and ethical standards," suggesting that Microsoft and Yahoo are willing to do this to make it easier for them to do business in China. Microsoft responded to criticism by saying, "We think it's better to be there with our services than not be there," as if it's worth sacrificing some freedom in order for the citizens of China to have access to the wonders of Microsoft.
Comments?
Para ver los comentarios ir a http://www.tompeters.com/entries.php?note=008496.php
El otro comentario aparte de la explicación trae algo de acción, eso me gusta!!!! y pertenece a Amestia Internacional http://web.amnesty.org/pages/chn-310106-action-eng .
También deberiamos hacer algo con Microsoft que algo tuvo que ver con el asunto.
Desde ya invito a todos a leer y ampliar el tema, ya que esta noticia no la he visto reflejada en los medios de mi pais ni en la región, como corresponde!!
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario